By: yogioz
I recently undertook a similar issue for a company – we designed a remote acess solution that didn’t use Citrix – we used VPN and Terminal Services via a radius server. The radius server holds the...
View ArticleBy: mrwizard
Your site-to-site bandwidth is the issue. Consider this: 1. Citrix ICA session is about 5k-20k per session 2. Exchange bandwidth is dependent upon size of email and attachments. Do the math. I have the...
View ArticleBy: christopherlee
With Citrix, the interaction of the Outlook/Exchange/Navision takes place locally at your HQ. The problems you have are either related to the backplane of the HQ’s LAN or the physical servers...
View ArticleBy: taney2000
I have to agree with Chris. I have never run Citrix though a 64K pipe. I think you first need to look at running everything through Citrix. If you are running exchange access through the same pipe it...
View ArticleBy: peacekeeper
Consider getting that 64k line upgraded first. it seems like it is choking your system ask your telecom people to give you a half a T1 line or 384K bandwidth before moving apps to the local...
View ArticleBy: sleiman
Hi; First of all; thank you very much and very nice chatting with you, as I mentioned my network consists of seven branches which are located in different places; Every each branch has at least 30...
View ArticleBy: imaginetsecurity
From my first posted reply…Please clarify some of the configuration. How many users at each site are contending for their respective 64Kbps access link? Are there any other services across the link...
View ArticleBy: christopherlee
From working for one of the top 7 Citrix resellers in North America during my past life, I can tell you that Citrix will be fine with bandwidth as little as 3Kbps/conn (assuming you have done the right...
View ArticleBy: khilving
Hi Sliman, Don’t lease more bandwidth yet, unless you own stock in the carrier! Bandwidth is not about speed, its about capacity. Increased capacity only fixes congestion problems. You indicate...
View Article
